Expert Advice on Airport Sealants and the Use of Silicone Pavement Sealants
Durability in an airport setting requires that joint sealants be able to sustain horizontal and vertical loads without cohesive or adhesive failure. These loads arise respectively from temperature driven cyclic opening and closing of joints, and from slow aircraft traffic. The ability of a joint sealant to sustain these loads varies according to its temperature-dependent stiffness and stress relaxation behaviors, along with its resistance to aging upon exposure to freezing and thawing, sunlight, rain, jet fuels or deicing fluids, alone or in combination.
Of particular importance to sealant performance is the ability of a sealant to strongly adhere to Portland Cement Concrete. Adhesion depends on sealant viscosity and chemistry, and sealant installation, which in an airport setting is particularly challenging. It is often necessary to install or replace joint sealants during summer nights or within a few hours so that aircraft traffic disruption is avoided. Hence, time for cleaning and preparing a joint for sealing and resealing can be very short, with the effect that resealed joints often fail in areas where old sealant remained. The sealant also needs to skin or cure quickly, before the pavement is back in service. In the end, it can be extremely difficult to find a joint sealant that meets all the requirements for service in an airport application.
Adheres to joint faces without internal rupturing when subjected to joint movements due to climatic and aircraft loads.
Resistant to moisture and weathering.
Resistant to jet-fuel or de-icing fluids.
Rejects intrusions of incompressible materials or can withstand the effects of intrusion.
Can be installed within hours.
Economical to install and replace.
Fortunately, silicone based pavement joint sealants have been used extensively in airfield applications for a number of years. The use of a 100% silicone-based sealant in traffic applications was initially met with skepticism because of the difference in physical properties when compared to traditional joint sealing materials, i.e., rubberized asphalt, neoprene, urethane. These more traditional materials do indeed have greater abrasion resistance and ultimate tensile strength; however, recessing of the silicone-based sealant in the joint reduces exposure to abrasion and the need for high abrasion resistance. Furthermore, most traditional joint sealants exhibit a high modulus of elasticity, which somewhat limits the movement capability of the sealant. While traditional pavement joint sealant will resist heavy traffic because of inherent mechanical properties they may fall short in maintaining a seal in applications experiencing high movement. Silicone based materials possess the ultra-low modulus necessary when sealing applications experiencing high movement. Airfield pavements fall into this high movement category.
The five basic criteria a sealant must meet for airfield applications are:
Resistance to ultra-violet light
Wide service temperature range
Cyclic movement capability
Jet fuel/oil resistance
Jet blast resistance
ASTM D 5893 (Cold Applied, Single Component, Chemically Curing Silicone Joint Sealant for Portland Cement Concrete Pavements) provides thorough test criteria for silicone sealant use on concrete pavement but does not directly address airfield applications. Pecora has chosen to use ASTM D5893 along with selected Pecora test methods for jet fuel resistance and jet blast resistance to certify Pecora 300SL & 301NS silicone pavement sealants for use on airfield applications. In addition, the Pecora 322FC two-component silicone pavement sealant meets ASTM D5893 and jet fuel resistance requirements.
Being that no ASTM test method exists for jet fuel resistance for one & two component silicone-based materials, Pecora has adopted a standard commonly used and accepted. The standard consists of laboratory testing which reproduces conditions created when a jet fuel spill occurs. Internal test results have shown Pecora 300SL, 301NS and 322FC silicone pavement sealants to perform within acceptable limits. Some swelling of sealant initially occurs with the swelling dissipating upon the drying of the jet fuel with no associated bond loss.
Test reports are available for ASTM D5893, SS-S-200E Jet Blast and Flame Resistance, and Pecora test method for jet-fuel resistance (Technical Bulletin #198). Pecora 300SL and 301NS comply with specifications as stated in FAA Engineering Brief No. 36.
Practical design of expansion joints should be carried out using a safety factor of 2 to 3. This would translate into joint designs requiring +/-25% movement. This safety factor is needed to compensate for variation in joint width and overall joint movement across multiple slabs. A minimum joint width of ¼” is acceptable with a minimum of 3/8“ being preferred. Refer to the table below for required sealant recess and dimensions. Consult Technical Service for joints >1.0” wide.
For more information, sealant application recommendations, or information on the installation procedures, we urge you to contact our Pecora Corporation Technical Services Group. Our expert team is highly qualified to recommend the proper solution for your project. Our Technical Services staff offers training in product technology and use, provides the technical assistance you require in the planning and implementation of your project. They can be reached by email email@example.com or by phone (800)-523-6688.
One response to “Expert Advice on Airport Sealants and the Use of Silicone Pavement Sealants”